|
Post by Halifax Hurricanes on Aug 22, 2017 12:46:10 GMT -5
Just wondering - in fantasy basketball with 20 teams and 16 players if need be would you ever consider reducing the league to 16 teams? Reason - considering the NBA has between 240 to 270 rotation players 16 teams with 16 players 256 players would fit nicely. As it is now free agency pick up with 320 players is largely irreverent - not necessarily a bad thing. However the excess 60 players are also largely irreverent. Of course if you can easily fill 6 leagues with 20 teams my point may also be largely irrelevant. Just a thought. Yes I do appreciate that 3 of the 16 positions on your roster to some degree functions as a development team.
|
|
|
Post by Dynasty Empire on Sept 7, 2017 22:32:37 GMT -5
Halifax thanks for your question. While i understand your point we feel that the level of competition ,GM experience and Dynasty format bodes well for our 20 team leagues. We want it to be challenging and we want our GM's that do their homework to benefit from their research. At this time they will remain as 20 team leagues.
|
|
|
Post by Halifax Hurricanes on Sept 8, 2017 2:31:12 GMT -5
That is perfectly all right as well - I was merely making the suggestion in case you would have problems filling all 7 leagues with 20 teams in each.
|
|