|
Post by Edmonton Crunch on Nov 25, 2016 22:59:58 GMT -5
Another idea from Margaritaville
"2.I suggested this in one of my leagues but league did not like one bit - put a Salary Cap on teams. Not really a Salary Cap but the words "Salary Cap" were not receptive. Just a rule that says - If any team has 6 or more Top 50 players, that team or teams could not trade for any other Top 50 player in a season. Top 50 based on whatever you want to go by. Yahoo average stats for previous season as an example. Just would make it harder for a team or teams to build a "Dynasty" team. I like it for league parity but league did not. I would even suggest 5 Top 50."
|
|
|
Post by Edmonton Crunch on Nov 25, 2016 23:02:53 GMT -5
This is not one I like personally. I've seen some dominant teams in FSC/AML and those guys worked hard to build their teams. Doom in BBall 3, Oakville in Hockey. Whales in Contract leagues.
|
|
|
Post by dino10k on Dec 5, 2016 17:37:25 GMT -5
I'm more about league parity. Not individual teams. If you have a 20 team league and 7-8 teams that suck, then you have 12-13 teams competing.....And 7-8 teams that suck. FSC Dynasty Basketball 1.
Team Margaritaville.
|
|
|
Post by Dynasty Empire on Mar 19, 2017 10:50:00 GMT -5
These ARE dynasty leagues. The whole point is to build a great team. We can't hold other teams back because cerain GM's don't take initiative to move forward.Most teams sit back and watch an active trader stockpile then complain, when those he is trading with would have taken a similar deal from other gm's if they had inquired.
|
|