|
|
Post by Fantasy Express on Aug 9, 2021 11:24:29 GMT -5
Looking to get some insight on this. I feel like if a rookie who is on a pro roster and not drafted in our minor draft should be eligible for free agency right away and not subject to any rookie thresholds.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stark Direwolves on Aug 10, 2021 7:03:59 GMT -5
I would agree. If the whole league passed on that player in the previous draft, said player should be a FA imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue Flames on Aug 10, 2021 7:09:04 GMT -5
Happy to be shown a reason to keep it, but from what I see. If a player is playing in the majors, I don’t see why they can’t sign an FSC contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by CFL Rejects on Aug 12, 2021 16:30:06 GMT -5
Agree
|
|
|
|
Post by Desert Dogs on Jan 27, 2022 20:40:31 GMT -5
I agree on this as well
|
|
|
|
Post by S-Man Fanatics on Jan 28, 2022 15:48:00 GMT -5
I agree
|
|
|
|
Post by Moorestown Big Dogs on Jan 29, 2022 10:07:31 GMT -5
My first reaction was that maybe a compromise number of At Bats or Innings might be better, but the more I thought about it, if they are in the majors, they probably ought to be up for auction.
I would say that we may want to consider a deadline (maybe the MLB trading deadline) for this rule to apply. It is one thing for a team to call up a guy we did not think was a prospect and he produces in April or May, and we shouldn't wait a month and a half for him to be eligible. It is another for a just drafted kid to come up for a spot start or a series, or for a guy to have a great minor league season and get called up in August or September. We still want to have good Prospects to draft.
|
|
